Tuesday, 18 November 2014

Rights for children still an illusion

Daily Times

Rights for children still an illusion

There is a need for proper and immediate legislation on corporal punishment, domestic child labour and early marriages so that the increasing trends of violence against children can be curbed

Former secretary general of the UN Kofi Annan once said: “There is no duty more important than ensuring that children’s rights are respected, that their welfare is protected, that their lives are free from fear and want and that they can grow up in peace.” November 20 is celebrated as Universal Children’s Day every year around the world. Pakistan ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) on November 12, 1990, which provides broader outlines for the promotion and protection of child rights. 
Pakistan ranks sixth amongst nations with the largest population and fifth among countries with the largest youth population. It is predicted that Pakistan’s population will almost double in the next 30 to 40 years and so will its youth population. Some 63 percent of our population is less than 25 years of age, 53 percent individuals are below 19 years of age and 35 percent of our population is between 15 to 24 years of age. This is in sharp contrast to 16 percent youth population witnessed in more stable countries like the US and Japan.
The UNCRC made it obligatory on the states that ratified the convention to take all appropriate legislative, administrative and other measures for the implementation of the rights enshrined in the convention but, unfortunately, there is no sound accomplishment of the state to share with the world on this year’s Universal Children’s Day. Over a decade has passed since we entered into the new millennium but the state of children in Pakistan is still far from satisfactory. In Pakistan, the convention is only enforceable if it is adopted through domestic legislation. Unfortunately, Pakistan has not introduced any such legislation up till now and the convention cannot be invoked in any domestic court of law. 
Let me briefly explain what the convention on the rights of the child says, as it is the first legally binding international instrument to incorporate the full range of human, civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights. The convention sets out these rights in 54 articles and two optional protocols. It spells out the basic human rights that children everywhere have: the right to survival, to develop to the fullest, protection from harmful influences, abuse and exploitation, and to participate fully in family, cultural and social life. The four core principles of the convention are non-discrimination, devotion to the best interests of the child, the right to life, survival and development, and respect for the views of the child. Every right spelled out in the convention is inherent to the human dignity and harmonious development of every child. The convention protects children’s rights by setting standards in healthcare, education and legal, civil and social services.
In Pakistan, violation of children’s rights is common but most of the children are subjected to torture in work places and educational institutions, sexual exploitation and abuse in urban areas in general and the rural areas of Pakistan in particular. The main reason behind this is lack of education, non-implementation of laws regarding children’s rights and irresponsible attitude on the part of the government. There is a need for proper and immediate legislation on corporal punishment, domestic child labour and early marriages so that the increasing trends of violence against children can be curbed. The responsibility for providing collective and individual safety lies on the state. Similarly, it is equally important to promote non-violent values in society through public awareness.
Pakistani laws do not afford sufficient protection against torture and other ill-treatment. This legislative lack is among the main causes of many cases of torture reported in Pakistan. Children interviewed by several organisations experienced that abuse ranging from slaps in the face following arrest to sustained torture, including being hung upside down, beaten, whipped with rubber belts or leather slippers, or deprived of sleep and sexual abuse. It is difficult to document these abuses since social and cultural factors inhibit children from testifying about such violations. Clear and strict definition of punishment for violence against children is also a necessary step. 
According to a report published by the non-governmental organisation Association Network for Community Empowerment (ANCE), almost 25 to 28 million children are out of school, 12 million are engaged in labour while around 618 newborn babies die every day in the country. This report should serve as an eye-opener for the government as well as the people of this country. The president of the ANCE Raja Abbas said, “ These children see a very different childhood because of their living conditions; they go through child abuse at a very young age, they are discriminated against and they have no protection from society. It is evident that the state of child rights in the country is deplorable, to say the least. We need the government, public, civil society and NGOs to come together and do everything possible to rectify the situation. With around 35 percent of Pakistan’s population aged 15 or below, the government must take the issue of child rights seriously. The Centre and the provinces need a coordinated policy in this regard, with proper legislation on child rights and making sure that existing laws are fully implemented. Children are the future of any society but the way we are treating ours is shameful and a disgrace for humanity. If we want our country to progress and move forward in the right direction, it is important that we protect child rights. By neglecting their rights, we are paving the way for a disastrous future for the country.” 
Moreover, Pakistan has failed to achieve its Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), particularly the fourth one: reducing infant mortality. Poor vaccination rates for children due to a weak immunisation system, a huge amount of out-of-school children, gender disparity in education, growing violence against children and increasing numbers of children living and/or working on the streets are the major issues that require due attention at the moment.
We all are well aware about the 18th Constitutional Amendment whereby child rights have been devolved to the provinces and more resources have also been geared towards the provinces. This is an opportunity to engage more with the provincial governments in order to push for realisation of the rights of the child in Pakistan. In the recent past, provinces have also taken various steps, including enactment of laws and policies central to improving the state of child rights in Pakistan but implementation is still a key concern. 
Such issues call for deliberation and require to be dealt with acutely, thus bringing about effective elucidations to the problems of our children, who are the hope for a better future for this nation. Instead of being passive about such situations, it is my opinion that the federal government should lead in the country’s vision, putting pressure on provincial governments to invest in our children. Our children have a right to be protected, educated, fed and heard. It is about time we give them just that.


The writer is a social and political activist based in Lahore and he can be reached at salmanali088@gmail.com

ایک ملاقات


Syed Nasir Ahmad Shahشہزاد لارنس بین المذاہب ہم آہنگی کے موضوع پر قلم اٹھانے والا باہمت دوست، میرے ہی شہر کا باسی ہے لیکن میں اسے اپنی سستی لکھوں گا کہ ہماری ملاقات نہیں رہی۔یہ پندرہ نومبر کی شام تھی، جب گوجرانوالہ پریس کلب کے سامنے کوٹ رادھا کشن کے انسانیت سوز سانحے پر بین المذاہب ہم آہنگی کے لئے کام کرنے والی سماجی تنظیم پیس اینڈ ڈیویلپمنٹ فاونڈیشن کی کال پر بہت ست دوست جمع تھے جن کا تعلق مختلف شعبہ ہائے زندگی سے تھا، ان میں لکھاری بھی تھے، انسانی حقوق کے اداروں سے منسلک لوگ بھی تھے، سول سوسائٹی کے لوگ اور پریس کے نمائندے۔یہ سانحہ انتہائی دلخراش ہے۔اس کی بھرپور مذمت کے بعد بھی تشنگی رہ جاتی ہے۔ زندہ انسانوں کو جلتے بھٹے کی نظر کر دینا۔ میں تو ابھی تک حیدری روڈ کے سانحے میں دم گھٹ کر مر جانے والی چھے ماہ کی کائنات کا دکھ فراموش نہیں کر پایا کہ کم و بیش ویسے ہی حالات میں مشتعل ہجوم نے بربریت کی ایک اور داستان رقم کر دی۔ بہرحال مہربانی انسانیت کا دکھ درد رکھنے والی شخصیات کی جو پریس کلب کے سامنے جمع ہوئیں۔ ایک رسمی احتجاج ریکارڈ کروایا گیا، چند مختصر مگر جامع تقاریر، پھر مرحومین کی یاد میں موم بتیاں جلائی گئیں۔ آہ وہ لوگ جنہوں نے ان کی زندگی کی شمعیں آگ کی نذر کردیں۔شرم سے سر جھک جاتا ہے کہ ظلم کی یہ داستانیں اس محسنِ انسانیت کی غلامی کا دم بھرنے والے رقم کر رہے ہیں جس نے حقیر کیڑے مکوڑوں کو جلانے پر بھی اظہارِ افسوس کیا تھا۔یہ کیسی غلامی اور کس طرح کی محبت ہے کہ اس کے نام پر مر مٹنے والے مجبور اور مظلوم لوگوں کی جان ومال کے دشمن ہوئے پھرتے ہیں؟ہم نے پاکستان کو اسلام کا قلعہ بنانے کا خواب دیکھا تھا۔یہ تو کسی اور خواب کی تعبیر معلوم ہوتی ہے۔میں کچھ جذباتی ہو گیا۔ ہم ہیں ہی جذباتی قسم کے لوگ۔اسی لئے ادھر لاوڈ سپیکر یا میگا فون سے کوئی اعلان ہوتا ہے ادھر ہم دامے درمے سخنے اپنے رواداری کی دھجیاں بکھیرنے نکل پڑتے ہیں۔کیوں نہ ہو ملک ہمارا ہے، قانون ساز ادارے ہمارے ہیں، سیاسی اور مذہبی رہنما ہمارے اور ہمارے جیسے ہیں،عدلیہ اور پولیس ہماری ہے، اقلیتیں بھی تو ہماری ہیں سو ہم جیسا سلوک چاہیں ان سے روا رکھیں، کسی کو کیا تکلیف؟ہم کسی کو مسلمان کہنے کا حق دیں یا چھین لیں ہماری مرضی، فتوے ہمارے، فتویٰ ساز ہمارے۔کل جو سلوک ہندوستان میں شودروں اور دلتوں سے ہوتا تھا ، آج وہی سلوک ہماری اقلیتوں سے نہ ہوا تو ہم اپنے ہمسائیوں سے پیچھے رہ جائیں گے، وہاں شودروں کے ساتھ جو سلوک ہوتا ہے وہ شاید ان کا سماجی رویہ ہے مگر ہم قانونی تقاضے بھی پورے کریں گے۔معاف کیجئے گا میں ایک مرتبہ پھر جذباتی ہو گیا۔بڑی معذرت۔میں بات کر رہاتھا پریس کلب کے سامنے ہونے والے احتجاج کی۔ تو رسمی احتجاج ہو گیا، موم بتیاں جل کر بجھ گئیں۔اب لوگ چھوٹی چھوٹی ٹولیوں کی صورت میں محوگفتگو ہیں۔ کہیں سعید اعوان اور اسرائیل ایڈووکیٹ ہیں۔ ان کے نام کے ساتھ ایڈووکیٹ نہ لکھیں تو صرف اسرائیل لکھتے ڈر لگتا ہے۔بڑی محبت کرنے والے دوست ہیں۔اچانک میری نظرایک شناسا سے چہرے پر پڑی، گویا کہیں کسی تصویر میں دیکھا ہے۔مجھے شک گزرا کہ موصوف شہزاد لارنس ہیں، وہی شہزاد لارنس جن کے نام سے چند روز قبل ’’ الفریڈ نوبل اگر آج زندہ ہوتا تو۔۔۔۔۔۔۔‘‘کے عنوان سے ایک کالم روزنامہ عوامی رنگ کی زینت بنا تھا۔میں تب سے ان کے فون نمبر کی تلاش میں تھاجو اس کالم میں مس پرنٹ تھا۔اب تو امیدبر آئی تھی ملاقات وہ بھی بالمشافہ۔میں ایک حیرت زدہ گرم جوشی کے ساتھ موصوف سے مخاطب ہوا، ان کا اسمِ گرامی پوچھنے کی جسارت کی، موصوف نے بڑی عاجزی اور انکساری سے تسلیم کیا کہ وہی شہزاد لارنس ہیں۔اب ایک دوسرے کے کالمز کے تعارف اور تعریف کا مرحلہ آگیا۔ پھر یکایک دو قہقہے اس سوگوار سی فضا میں بلند ہوئے۔ واقعہ یون تھا کہ ’’الفریڈ نوبل اگر آج زندہ ہوتا تو ۔۔۔۔۔‘‘نامی کالم میں نے ملالہ یوسف کے لئے نوبل پرائز کے اعلان کے بعد لکھا اور محترم مبشر بٹ صاحب کو ای میل کر دیا تھا جو کمپوزر کی غلطی کے باعث محترم شہزاد لارنس کے نام سے چھپ گیا۔ہم دونوں اس صورت حال سے محظوظ ہوئے بغیر نہ رہ سکے۔کہتے ہیں کہ انت بھلا سو بھلا، کمپوزر کی یہ غلطی ہم دونوں کی پہلی ملاقات کا باعث بن گئی۔ مجھے لگتا ہے اس پہلی ملاقات کے بعد دوسری، تیسری بلکہ بہت سی مزید ملاقاتوں کی گنجائش بن گئی ہے۔بین المذاہب ہم آہنگی جیسے حساس موضوع پر لکھنا اور کھل کر بات کرنا میڈیا کی آزادی کے اس دور میں بھی یقین کریں آسان نہیں ہے لیکن خوب گزرے گی جو مل بیٹھیں گے دیوانے دو۔شہزاد لارنس مے بڑی درست بات کہی کہ اسلام، عیسائیت یا کوئی بھی اور مذہب اپنے ماننے والوں کو ظلم و بربریت کی تعلیم نہیں دیتا۔مذہب تو باہمی محبت، احترامِ انسانیت اور رواداری کا دوسرا نام ہے۔ گوجرہ اور بادامی باغ، حیدری روڈ اور کوٹ رادھا کشن کے سانحے کسی مذہبی تعلیم کا نتیجہ نہیں ہیں بلکہ دراصل مذہبی تعلیم سے دوری یا کم فہمی کے عکاس ہیں۔ شہزاد لارنس کا کہنا تھا کہ یہ واقعات ہمارے سماجی رویوں کے عکاس ہیں۔ مجھے لگتا ہے شہزاد نے بالکل صحیح کہا ہے۔ ہمارے سماج میں واقعی برداشت، تحمل اور رواداری جیسی صفات مفقود ہوتی چلی جا رہی ہیں۔ہمیں انسانیت کا پاس ہے نہ حیوانیت کا ڈر۔ اکیسویں صدی میں ہم لوگ حیوانیت اور انسانیت کے بارڈر پر کھڑے ہیں۔ ہمارے جذبات کی ہوائیں کبھی ہمیں حیوانیت کی طرف دھکیل دیتی ہیں اور ہم اپنے جیسے لوگوں کو تو زندہ جلاتے اور دم گھٹ کر مرجانے پر مجبور کرتے ہی ہیں، ان معصوم روحوں کی جان سے بھی کھیل جاتے ہیں جنہوں نے ابھی اس دنیا میں آنا ہوتا ہے۔ حیدری روڈ اور رادھا کشن دونوں واقعات میں یہ ظلم بھی قدرِ مشترک ہے۔ پھر جب سیلاب اور زلزلے ہمارا مقدر بنتے ہیں تو ہمارے اندر چھپی انسانیت انگڑائی لیتی ہے اورہم اپنا تن من دھن دکھی انسانیت کی خدمت کے لئے وار دینے پر آمادہ نظر آتے ہیں۔ دو حدیں ہیں جن کے درمیان ہمارے سماجی رویے پنڈولم بنے رہتے ہیں یا ہو سکتا ہے ہمارا معاشرہ سماجی رویوں کے لحاظ سے انسانوں اور حیوانوں کے درمیان منقسم ہو۔ ایسا بعید از قیاس نہیں۔ ہر معاشرے میں ایسا ممکن ہو سکتا ہے لیکن وہ لوگ جو خاموش اکثریت اور تماشائی ہیں ان کو کیا کہیں جو ظلم ہوتا دیکھتے ہیں مگر ظالم کو برا کہنے کا حوصلہ نہیں رکھتے۔ جو کائنات کا دکھ محسوس تو کرتے ہوں گے مگر مصلحت کا لبادہ اوڑھے اس کے قاتلوں کے گلے میں پھولوں کے ہار دیکھتے ہیں اور چپ رہتے ہیں، جو شہزاد اور شمع کی یاد میں کوئی موم بتی جلانے کی ہمت نہیں کرتے۔شاید کوئی آنسو ان کی گال پر ڈھل جاتا ہو۔ وگرنہ کائنات کی سسکیاں اور شمع اور اس کے بطن کی معصوم امانت کا نوحہ ان ظالموں کو اپنے خون سے لکھنا پڑے گا

Sunday, 16 November 2014

We were all there

Daily Times

When the state has itself declared in its laws that even in the 21st century its citizens can be arrested and given the death penalty if they do not subscribe to a particular set of beliefs, then in what way can we expect illiterate folk to desist from honour killing in the name of religion?

A handful of burnt bones were all that was left to establish the identity of a woman who was, until a while before, carrying a baby in her poverty-stung body. Her husband had vowed at the time of their wedding to “take her as his lawful wife to have and to hold, from that day forward, for better or for worse, for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and cherish until death do them part.” And, remaining true to his vow, his body’s ashes also lay now beside hers. What happened at Kot Radha Kishan is a sad story of various shades of human emotions: love, hatred, vanity, frenzy, hope, fear, tragedy. We can see it all there.
I am not in a rush to issue a self-comforting statement of condemnation against the perpetrators and then resume enjoying the usual perks of my life. If Ghalib’s soul had been watching the media coverage of the incident he would have summed it up all in one verse: “Jala hei jism jahan dil bhi jal gaya hoga, khuredte ho jo ab raakh justujoo kia hey?” (with the body consigned to flames the heart too would have burnt, so for what are you raking the ashes now?).
In the past one month, many incidents involving loss of life have occurred in Pakistan. On sectarian grounds, the Shia community was again targeted and on Wagah border a suicide bomber killed a large number of innocent commoners. However, the lynching of a Christian couple by a violent mob in rural Punjab tops the list for many reasons. In sectarian violence or terrorism, the deadly fallout is the outcome of one crazy individual who, in the process, also blasts himself. However, in blasphemy-ignited communal violence, the whole of Pakistani society lends its hand in the commission of the gory offence. When the state has itself declared in its laws that even in the 21st century its citizens can be arrested and given the death penalty if they do not subscribe to a particular set of beliefs, then in what way can we expect illiterate rural folk to desist from honour killing in the name of religion?
Laws represent the social consensus of a society at a given period in time. Jesus was charged with blasphemy and given the death penalty when he failed to satisfy the alarmed clergy of the Jerusalem temple. Sir Thomas Moore was beheaded for not following the new Church of England. In 1656, James Naylor was tried for blasphemy and then sentenced to flogging, branding and the piercing of the tongue by a red-hot poker. However, societies gradually improve their social consensus and sensitivities towards the idea of ‘holiness’ also keep changing. The debate on blasphemy continued in the UK and social consensus kept gravitating towards the side of freedom of expression. Blasphemy was restricted to only contemptuous, reviling, scurrilous or ludicrous matter relating to Christian figures as the law made a clear exclusion that “it is not blasphemous to speak or publish opinions hostile to the Christian religion, or to deny the existence of God, if the publication is couched in decent and temperate language.” The common law offence was, however, formally abolished through the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. 
In UK society we saw a gradual evolution towards the repeal of the centuries old law of blasphemy. However, ironically, in Pakistan we find the opposite trend. Jinnah had assumed — arguably wishful thinking — that if Muslims lived in an independent state, the communal extremism trend that he had observed in the wake of the Ilm Uddin fiasco in the 1920s would vanish and all energies would be focused upon building a progressive and enabling state. In the Ilm Uddin case, Jinnah had pleaded for mercy on account of the accused’s young age and the fact that he was illiterate. The British Indian government then decided to insert section 295 A in the Indian Penal Code to discourage communal riots by making blasphemy against holy figures of any religious community an offence. Fully cognisant of communal tensions, Jinnah still was not happy with this new insertion and expressed his fears in the select committee that the new law might stifle the genuine questioning of certain faith-related idiocies. The government, however, was harder pressed with maintaining law and order, and passed the new law. After Pakistan came into being Jinnah made his intentions for a progressive country very clear with his first speech to the Constituent Assembly. However, instead of gravitating towards an open and secular Pakistan, we registered the gradual slide towards an intolerant theocratic society. Zia introduced new blasphemy insertions into the old law, thus subverting the constitutionally guaranteed right of equality of all faiths in criminal law. Since then, our legislators are unable to change the law nor can our judges declare the law unconstitutional.
When a judge awards the death penalty to an accused, not for murdering another human being but just because the accused uttered some words that the hearer or reader found offensive, or when a member of one sectarian group sprays bullets on a congregation of another sectarian community, or when a mob accuses a man and then lynches him to a gory death, we can find the same sense of dehumanisation running through all these cases. The blood of all those killed on the charge of blasphemy is on our sleeves as we remained silent all these years while the demon kept growing in all directions. 


The writer teaches public policy in the UK and is the founding member of the Rationalist Society of Pakistan. He can be reached at hashah9@yahoo.com

The original post available at:
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/15-Nov-2014/we-were-all-there

Pakistan: Threats issued on Jama'at-e Islami stationary force Ahmadis to flee their homes | Updated

"Qadianis: Your heretic activities continue in the worship centers. You are hereby informed, if you will not immediately cease your worship, you will be attacked anytime." 

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: Social media / files
By Staff Report | November 13, 2014

A threat allegedly issued on behalf of Jamat-e Islami has spread fear and anxiety among Ahmadis in Lahore, capital of the Punjab province of Pakistan.

Credible and verified reports of threats against the lives of Ahmadi families in a particular area of Lahore have surfaced in social media with images of malicious handbills warning Ahmadis to abandon their 'worship activities' or face imminent attacks.

The handbills in multiple versions, allegedly printed on the stationary depicting letterheads of Jama'at-e Islami, an Islamist religio-political group, are being distributed near Mansoora, the headquarters of the group.

"Qadianis: Your heretic activities continue in the worship centers," the handbill says, further warning, "You are hereby informed, if you will not immediately cease your worship, you will be attacked anytime."  (The word Qadiani is used as a derogatory term by ant-Ahmadi groups.)

'You have 2 to 3 days," the poster sets a deadline for Ahmadi to comply with.

The poster text ends with closing line, "Jama'at-e Islaimi Pakistan."

One of the two individualized versions of the poster distributed in Lahore seems to be meant for Ahmadiyya mosques and the other for the individual Ahmadi homes.

One such incidents of a threat to an individual home took place in Ravi Block of Allama Iqbal Town in Lahore, an area close to Mansoorah, where on the evening of November 10, a threatening poster and a piece of white cloth symbolizing burial shroud -- also known as kafan -- were delivered.

Despite the repeated attempts by the affected families, the local police have refused to take information and register a case; and, as a result, Ahmadi families were forced to abandon their homes due to insecurity.

Although Jama'at-e Islami has issued a denial on their Facebook page, assigning blame for creation of the malicious poster to a Karachi based 'ethnic group', the organization did not outright condemn the act of making threats against Ahmadis.

Imran Jattala, editor of Ahmadiyya Times, says for Ahmadis the threat is real, even if the poster is a fake. "A lone maverick or not, all threats are serious."

With a dreary track record of Pakistani authorities in protecting Ahmadis from repeated target killings, mob violence and terrorists attacks, the feelings of insecurity are rampant among the community members everywhere.

"For us they all are the same. So whoever is behind it, it doesn't matter. Even Jama'at-e Islami didn't say it's wrong," observed Afzal Mirza, a senior Ahmadiyya Muslim missionary from Canada.

  --  Updated November 14, 2014 11:55 AM (PST)
  --  Courtesy @SOCRAT3S


  --  Pakistan: Threats issued on Jama'at-e Islami stationary force Ahmadis to flee their home

Sunday, 9 November 2014

Pakistan: Maligning Islam in the name of blasphemy


The space – ought to be occupied by justice – between allegation and execution is filled by a mob and exploited, misconstrued beliefs. PHOTO: AFP

Charred remains of two human bodies become a question mark on our humanity. Smoke that rises from their ashes is denser than one that clouds our judgment. It will not vanish into the air; it will instead taunt our silence forever. What burnt was not bodies, but the very fabric of our society.
In the presence of the rule of law – as demanded by the Holy Quran and our constitution – blasphemy would be dealt with by the aggrieved party registering a case against the accused under relevant sections of the Pakistan Penal Code. A free and fair trial in a court of law would follow where the accused would be given an opportunity to defend himself and the alleger would have to corroborate his allegation with evidence. And if the accused is found guilty, he or she would be punished in accordance with the law and Islamic injunctions.
Sadly, in several cases of alleged blasphemy, the practice has been nothing but un-Islamic, unlawful and unjust. The space – ought to be occupied by justice – between allegation and execution is filled by a mob and exploited, misconstrued beliefs. There is no due process, no court and no opportunity to defend oneself.
The threat looms over all our heads, not just the non-Muslims. All you need to have me killed by an “angry mob” is an accusation of blasphemy. There is no need for any proof, a fair trial or even an actual occurrence to constitute someone as blasphemous.
All you need is:
1. A statement from a local or regional “religious” person that labels my action blasphemous,
2. Inciting locals of the area to stage a protest against my alleged act to reaffirm their faith, and
3. Inducting a few individuals in the crowd who will then finish the task.
It does not matter if the person is qualified to give such a grave statement or not. He only needs to have the appearance of a religious person, being “perceived” as a scholar is an added qualification. Reality does not matter, what matters is perception. My act does not have to bear any semblance to blasphemy. If perceived as a scholar, he can even tag my criticism of Ziaul Haq, or laws made by him, as blasphemous.
In matters of blasphemy, an accusation suffices. Chant the slogan “this is for Allah, or his Prophet (SAW)”, and it will give this farcical act a legitimate face for the simpletons who are often the tools used in such acts that demean both Islam and humanity.
When interpreting laws, courts pay heed to the language used by legislators for it is assumed that the words used have been used for a reason. Surely Allah is the best and wisest of all legislators. Why then did He use the word “person” and not “Muslim” in the Holy Quran when He equated the unjust, unlawful murder of a person with the murder of all humans? In Islam, the life of a non-Muslim is as sacred as that of a Muslim. Islam bestows the right to life and fair trial for all human beings without any preference to religious inclinations.
The debate pertaining to what legally constitutes as blasphemy is a separate issue. Is following the proper course of law next? Ending someone’s life on a mere accusation cannot be called fair under any law, especially not under laws of Islam.
Kot Radha Kishan was the latest burial ground for justice and rule of law. A couple was killed by a mob after being alleged of blasphemy. This of course is not the first, but one of many murders of people who have been accused of blasphemy. In July this year, Gujranwala saw murder of three members of the Ahmadi community. In July 2012, a mentally unstable man met the worst of fates by being burnt alive by an enraged mob. In December of the same year, a Muslim man was dragged out of a police station in Karachi, beaten and then burnt alive. The reason for all these horrible acts is “alleged” blasphemy. The word “alleged” does not carry any meaning when it becomes a prefix to blasphemy.
It would be refreshing to see religious scholars, real and perceived, coming together to condemn, and declare this vicious inhumanity in the name of Islam as unIslamic. The responsibility to correct this wrong falls on the shoulders of religious leaders. The interpretation of Islamic injunctions in accordance with the spirit of Islam is the duty of any person who calls himself an Islamic scholar.
Blasphemy is a crime in Islam; a blasphemer needs to be punished, but only in accordance with the teachings of Islam. We cannot malign our religion in its own name. It is the duty of the state through the government to call upon Muslim scholars and leaders to gather and work to eradicate this vice of extra judicial killings based on a mere allegation which may in all probability be false in many cases.
I know our heads of state are not Hazrat Umar (RA), but neither was this a dog or a camel, it didn’t happen at the banks of Euphrates and it wasn’t hunger or thirst that killed. They were two human beings, tortured and burnt alive for a crime they may not have committed.
The act of accusing a man of having ridiculed our religion and then killing him – in the absence of any proof, process of law and justice – causes more ridicule to our religion than the alleged words or actions.   We, as Muslims, need to visit, I wouldn’t say revisit as many of us may not have deduced our beliefs but only adopted them as they have been portrayed, our beliefs. We need to ask ourselves if such acts of violence and injustice are a service to Allah or an invitation to his wrath.
zafar.zulqurnain.sahi

Zafar Zulqurnain Sahi

A Lawyer by profession. A Gold Medalist in LLB from Punjab University and has a LLM degree from University of Warwick, UK. He is also a former Member Provincial Assembly of Punjab (2008-2013). He tweets @ZafarSahi (twitter.com/ZafarSahi)
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

for original post plz click 
http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/24723/maligning-islam-in-the-name-of-blasphemy/

Sattar terms Christian couple’s murder ‘act of blasphemy’

Sattar terms Christian couple’s murder ‘act of blasphemy’

KARACHI: Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) leader, Dr Farooq Sattar, Saturday termed the cold-blooded murder of a Christian couple in Kasur as a disrespect of blasphemy laws.
“Misuse of blasphemy laws is also tantamount to committing an act of blasphemy,” Dr Sattar said while addressing a press conference here.
“If we did not take a step to prevent this law, then this game would become order of every street,” he warned.
He said the term ‘minority’ itself was in conflict with the country’s laws and ‘we will have to strike it off from our Constitution’.
The MQM leader lamented that innocents were being made the target of personal hatred in an apparent absence of laws.

He said Quaid-e-Azam’s Pakistan was being torn apart in pieces and being packed in a casket under a conspiracy.
for original post click
http://www.geo.tv/article-165112-Sattar-terms-Christian-couples-murder-act-of-blasphemy

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Mob violence: Killing of Christian couple slammed province-wide

Source: Express Tribune
6th of Nov 2014

Christian community members gather at a local church at Kot Radha Kishan where the coffins are placed. PHOTO: SHAFIQ MALIK/EXPRESS
FAISALABAD / LAHORE: 
Members of the civil society and representatives of the Christian community on Wednesday condemned the killing of a Christian coupleaccused of blasphemy on Tuesday in Kot Radha Kishan in Kasur.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) expressed grave concern over the incident in a statement issued on Wednesday.  The statement was based on the preliminary findings of a fact finding team that had visited the area. The commission said the team had found no evidence of the alleged desecration of Holy Quran. The HRCP said the incident appeared to be rooted in a dispute over wages and outstanding payments. Shehzad, one of the victims, had been asked by the kiln owner to repay the advance he had extended to the families of two Muslim labourers. The owner had asked him to repay the amount as Shehzad had introduced the men to him.
The commission said it appeared that Shehzad and his expectant wife, Salma, were locked up in a room after being beaten up at the kiln. Some bystanders said Shehzad had died while being thrashed. The HRCP said hundreds of people had started moving towards the kiln as word of the alleged desecration spread through loudspeakers mounted at mosques. The commission said four policemen had visited the scene and demanded the custody of the couple. The HRCP said the owner had instructed his employees to refuse to cede to the police’s request. The commission said the policemen were also beaten up.
The HRCP said it was still waiting for the police’s version. The district police officer told the commission that the incident was being probed and police had arrested 40 people including the kiln owner.  The HRCP said the incident represented the vanishing writ of the statement as the policemen were unable to secure the couple’s custody.
The commission also demanded swift action to be taken against those guilty of instigating violence against the victims and preventing their rescue from the kiln. The HRCP also drew attention to the plight of kiln workers and demanded an end to such practices that continue to flourish despite constitutional safeguards.
Separately, Bishop of Faisalabad Joseph Arshad condemned the killings on Wednesday.
Special prayers for the deceased and national prosperity and integrity were also offered on the occasion at the Bishop House Catholic Church.
Those present on the occasion urged the government to impartially probe the incident and punish those held responsible for it.
They also urged the government to ensure the life and property of Christians and other minorities in Pakistan. The participants said this was necessary to promote communal goodwill and harmony in society.
National Commission for Justice and Peace Director Father Symon Khurshid demanded that the government take notice of the incident.
He also urged the government to ensure that the rights and privileges of minorities were safeguarded in accordance with a verdict of former chief justice of Pakistan Tassaduq Hussain Jillani.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 6th, 2014.

Horrible barbarism

Source: Daily Times
6th of  Nov 2014

The blasphemy law is in need of not only revision but repeal. The abuse this law is open to has become intolerable to the extent that Pakistan is viewed as a country that cannot prevent the killings of the religious minorities. This impression has gained currency because of the government’s complacency towards the massacre of the minorities at the hands of vigilante mobs given license to torture and kill people in the name of Islam. Case after case has proved that most of these killings have their origins in settling personal scores. The Punjab government’s swift action against the killing of a Christian couple in Kot Radha Kishan on the charges of burning copies of the Quran is welcome. However, it remains to be seen what eventually emerges from this case, whether the perpetrators are caught and punished for the crime or will there be a replay of the lack of evidence justification to draw the curtain on the issue. This is the time to act and if not now, the forces taking advantage of the blasphemy law will gain strength from the fact that not only are they free to abuse the law, the government and judicial system are weak enough to be pressurised to absolve them of their heinous deeds.
One is shocked at the inhumane ways mobs adopt to punish alleged blasphemers. What kind of society have we become? We seem to savour killing people. We brutalise them in the name of a religion that promotes peace. It is madness to lynch others on mere hearsay, a proposition strongly condemned in Islam. The couple killed by so-called Muslims were first dragged out of their home, locked up by the owner of the brick kiln in a room, later tortured and burnt alive in the kiln. A few burnt pages from the Quran allegedly found in their trash were the only ‘evidence’ that provoked the crowd to kill the couple. Is this all this society has been reduced to: an emotionally charged crowd, ever ready to kill others with impunity? There is little doubt that this is yet another ploy to implicate innocent Christians to settle a personal vendetta. It raises questions about the general mindset of people who could be so easily provoked by a call from a cleric to take the law into their own hands. It is time that we revisit the reasons for this societal degradation, along with our inability to live peacefully with fellow human beings and the critical need to mend our ways.

The original post available at:
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/editorial/06-Nov-2014/horrible-barbarism